Overview
- Judge Adrián González Charvay declared invalid Article 3 of Decree 534/2025, reinstating Law 27.793’s protections for the two minors at the center of the amparo.
- The court ordered the families’ obra social to adapt benefits in line with the emergency law and placed case costs on the National State.
- The ruling finds the veto discriminatory and contrary to constitutional and treaty obligations, holding that children’s health, education and rehabilitation take precedence over budget constraints.
- It cites a recent Inter‑American Court advisory opinion recognizing an autonomous right to care and applies the principle of non‑regression in social rights.
- The Presidency had justified the veto with projected costs of over 7 trillion pesos in 2025 and around 17 trillion in 2026; the government may appeal, and the decision is viewed as a first precedent likely to spur similar amparos as Congress readies a session to address recent vetoes.