Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Federal Court Dismisses Torres Strait Islanders’ Climate Duty-of-Care Claim

The judgment carried a warning that without deeper emissions cuts the islands face flooding that could erase ancestral sites.

Plaintiffs Pabai Pabai (L) and Paul Kabai (R) said they were devastated by the Federal Court's decision
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • Justice Michael Wigney dismissed the 2021 duty-of-care suit brought by Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai, ruling the Commonwealth government has no legal obligation to prevent climate change harms under negligence law.
  • Evidence presented during on-country hearings and in Melbourne showed sea levels rising at twice the global rate, coastal erosion, soil salinity and the destruction of ancestral graves undermining the islands’ habitability.
  • Wigney accepted that Australia’s greenhouse gas targets between 2015 and 2021 disregarded the best available science but insisted that setting emissions goals is a political question for Parliament.
  • The plaintiffs and their supporters pledged to continue campaigning for stronger national emissions cuts and federal funding for adaptation measures despite the ruling.
  • Financed by the Grata Fund and modelled on the Dutch Urgenda case, the challenge highlights evolving debates on indigenous rights and could shape future global climate litigation.