Overview
- Sir Philip Green seeks to limit the use of parliamentary privilege to reveal information protected by court injunctions, citing his right to a fair trial under Article Six of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- The legal challenge stems from Lord Hain naming Green in Parliament in 2018 as the subject of serious allegations, bypassing a court injunction protecting his identity.
- A ruling from the European Court of Human Rights is expected today and could set a precedent on the limits of parliamentary free speech in the UK.
- Critics, including Lord Hain, have condemned Green’s legal action as an attempt to suppress democratic protections and deflect attention from allegations of misconduct.
- The case has reignited debates about the influence of the European Court of Human Rights on UK sovereignty and its role in domestic decision-making.