Particle.news

Download on the App Store

EPA Administrator Defends Deep Budget Cuts and Grant Cancellations in Senate Hearing

Lee Zeldin faced intense scrutiny over plans to slash EPA funding by 55%, reduce staff to historic lows, and cancel nearly 800 grants, as Democrats warned of severe public health risks.

Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., from left, speaks as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and Sen. Cory Booker D-N.J., listen during a live-streamed conversation on the steps of the Capitol, Sunday, April 27, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
FILE - EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House, April 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)
Lee Zeldin, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) testifies before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works during a hearing regarding President Trump's budget request for the agency in Washington DC, on Wednesday, May 21, 2025. President Trump's budget proposal for the EPA calls for more than a 50 percent cut in the budget from last year's.
Image

Overview

  • The Trump administration's proposed 2026 EPA budget seeks a 55% funding reduction, cutting $4.5 billion and reducing staff to levels last seen four decades ago.
  • Administrator Lee Zeldin defended the cancellation of 781 Biden-era grants worth nearly $2 billion, claiming thorough reviews were conducted, a claim disputed by Senate Democrats citing conflicting court filings and agency testimony.
  • Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Adam Schiff accused Zeldin of procedural inconsistencies and warned that the cuts would lead to increased pollution, dirtier water, and higher cancer rates.
  • Zeldin argued the cuts were necessary to eliminate waste and prioritize fiscal responsibility, accusing Democrats of ignoring taxpayer concerns and defending his agency's actions as aligned with Trump's agenda.
  • Democrats signaled ongoing inquiries and potential legal challenges over the grant cancellations and the broader deregulatory push, emphasizing the public health consequences of the proposed changes.