Particle.news
Download on the App Store

England Bathing Waters Improve Slightly as Rivers Largely Fail in Latest Tests

Regulatory changes now in force reshape how sites are classified, with more flexible monitoring and an end to automatic de-designation.

Overview

  • Environment Agency data show 392 of 449 bathing waters rated excellent or good (87%), with 417 (93%) at least sufficient and 32 classed as poor.
  • Rivers performed worst, with 12 of 14 river bathing sites rated poor; only Friars Meadow on the Stour was good and Wallingford Beach on the Thames was sufficient.
  • New rules effective since November 21 end automatic de-designation after five poor years, add feasibility tests for new applications, and allow more flexible monitoring, with further criteria reforms due in May 2026.
  • Officials cite sewage discharges and agricultural run-off as major pollution sources along with local factors such as birds and dogs, and they say a dry summer helped lift many coastal ratings.
  • Bognor Regis, Scarborough South Bay and Littlehaven in South Shields were rated poor, and source-tracking at Scarborough identified mixed human, ruminant and bird markers as contributors; campaigners argue oversight and enforcement remain inadequate.