Ed Miliband Faces Renewed Criticism Over 2013 Syria Vote
The fall of Bashar al-Assad reignites debate over UK Parliament's decision against military intervention over a decade ago.
- Ed Miliband, now Energy Secretary, defends his 2013 decision as Labour leader to oppose UK airstrikes against Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria.
- The 2013 vote, which blocked military intervention, has been blamed by critics for prolonging Assad's rule and allowing Russia to expand its influence in the region.
- Health Secretary Wes Streeting argues that the UK's hesitation in 2013 created a vacuum that enabled Assad to remain in power and allowed Russia to intervene militarily in Syria.
- Miliband maintains that the decision was correct, citing the lack of a clear exit strategy and lessons learned from the Iraq War as key reasons for opposing military action.
- The debate resurfaces as Assad flees to Moscow following a major rebel offensive that ends his family's 50-year rule in Syria.