Drosten: Sweden's Pandemic Strategy Would Not Have Worked in Germany

Virologist Christian Drosten cites population density, industrial focus, and regional differences as key reasons for the infeasibility of Sweden's voluntary measures in Germany.

• Christian Drosten, a leading virologist, argued that Sweden's voluntary pandemic strategy would not have been effective in Germany due to significant structural differences between the two countries.
• Sweden, with a population one-tenth the size of Germany's and fewer urban centers, relied on high levels of remote work and individual responsibility during the first wave of COVID-19.
• Germany's numerous densely populated regions and reliance on manufacturing industries made widespread remote work less feasible compared to Sweden's service-oriented economy.
• Drosten noted that Sweden's approach shifted during the second wave, adopting stricter measures comparable to those implemented in Germany.
• As a prominent voice during the pandemic, Drosten used his podcast to provide scientific updates and address public questions about COVID-19 strategies and developments.

3 Articles

WELT Der Tagesspiegel Sächsische Zeitung