Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Dozen Federal Judges Rebuke Supreme Court's Terse Emergency Rulings in Trump Cases

They say unexplained orders leave lower courts exposed to attacks without guidance.

Overview

  • An NBC News report quotes 12 currently serving federal judges, appointed by presidents of both parties, criticizing the Supreme Court for overturning their rulings in Trump-related cases with little or no explanation.
  • NBC’s review found the Court granted the administration’s emergency requests in 17 of 23 cases since January, with five orders containing no substantive reasoning and several others offering only brief guidance.
  • Judges described a rise in threats and harassment after high‑profile decisions, with one warning that without major changes, “somebody is going to die.”
  • Several judges urged Chief Justice John Roberts to more forcefully defend the judiciary and to provide clearer explanations in emergency rulings as the shadow docket’s use has expanded.
  • Conservative outlets condemned NBC’s use of anonymous sources and questioned potential bias, while the Supreme Court’s public information office did not immediately offer comment.