Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Disney Seeks Restraining Order to Bar Former Exec’s Move to YouTube

June 4 hearing will test if California law enforces Connolly’s fixed-term pact despite YouTube’s assertion he was an at-will employee.

Image
Justin Connolly (Photo courtesy of Disney)

Overview

  • Disney filed suit on May 21 in Los Angeles Superior Court accusing YouTube and Justin Connolly of breach of a three-year contract, tortious interference and unfair competition.
  • Connolly signed the November 2024 agreement with Disney that included a one-time termination right effective March 1, 2027, and disclosed his move to YouTube in April 2025.
  • In its June 2 opposition, YouTube contends Connolly was an at-will employee and pledges he won’t handle any licensing negotiations with Disney.
  • YouTube’s filing accuses Disney of using Connolly as a “pawn” to pressure its license renewal talks, while Disney argues his intimate knowledge of its distribution deals poses irreparable harm.
  • The court’s decision on the temporary restraining order could set a precedent for enforcing fixed-term pacts and affect executive mobility in the streaming industry.