Disney Seeks Dismissal of Wrongful Death Lawsuit Using Streaming Terms
The company argues that Disney+ terms require arbitration, while the plaintiff's lawyers call the tactic unreasonable and unfair.
- Jeffrey Piccolo filed a lawsuit claiming his wife died from an allergic reaction at a Disney World restaurant.
- Disney's legal team argues the case should be dismissed based on the Disney+ terms of service requiring arbitration.
- The plaintiff's attorneys describe Disney's argument as absurd and shocking to the judicial conscience.
- Disney asserts that the restaurant involved is neither owned nor operated by them.
- A court hearing is scheduled for October 2nd to address the motion.