Devin Nunes Loses Defamation Appeal Over Esquire Article
A federal appeals court upheld the dismissal of Nunes' lawsuit, citing lack of evidence for damages caused by the 2018 article.
- The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Devin Nunes and his family's defamation claims regarding allegations in a 2018 Esquire article about undocumented labor at their Iowa dairy farm.
- Nunes failed to provide evidence of special damages, including any economic harm, reputational damage, or impact on his political or professional career due to the article.
- The court noted that Nunes' campaign funding increased significantly across election cycles, and his post-Congress employment as CEO of Truth Social was unaffected by the publication.
- The NuStar plaintiffs, representing Nunes' family farm, also failed to demonstrate economic harm or reputational damage, with evidence showing increased revenues after the article's publication.
- The case highlights the challenges of proving defamation claims and underscores calls for stronger anti-SLAPP laws to deter frivolous lawsuits aimed at silencing journalists.