Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Delhi High Court Weighs Forgery Claims Over Sunjay Kapur Will as Errors, Metadata Disputes Surface

The High Court scheduled further scrutiny for Tuesday following arguments that raised substantial questions over the will’s provenance.

Overview

  • Samaira and Kiaan Kapur told the court the document misspells their half-brother’s name and lists incorrect addresses for them, calling the will uncharacteristic of their father.
  • Plaintiffs cited a digital trail showing the file originated on Nitin Sharma’s device with edits on March 17 and March 24 despite a March 21 execution date, and questioned uncertified WhatsApp records used to circulate a PDF.
  • The will allegedly omits a standard asset schedule and key holdings, including overseas property and valuables, while internal inconsistencies were highlighted in listed bank accounts.
  • Chain of custody is disputed, with counsel saying the named executor was not informed in advance, the original was handed over at the cremation, and the children have only seen a copy.
  • Priya Kapur’s side denies fabrication and says electronic evidence supports the will; plaintiffs argue the estate’s distribution heavily favors Priya and her son, and the judge has sought a verified asset list under seal.