Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Delhi High Court Upholds Dowry Harassment Discharge, Rules Tears Insufficient Evidence

The ruling highlights that emotional testimonials alone cannot satisfy the prima facie threshold in dowry cruelty cases.

Image

Overview

  • The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the trial court’s discharge of a husband and his relatives from dowry harassment and cruelty charges under Section 498A of the IPC.
  • Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed that the woman’s tears, recorded in a Section 161 Cr.P.C. statement by her sister, do not constitute prima facie proof of harassment.
  • The post-mortem report attributing the woman’s 2014 death to pneumonia was central to the courts’ finding that no cruelty leading to death had occurred.
  • Prosecutors claimed nearly ₹4 lakh in wedding expenses followed by demands for a motorcycle, cash and a gold bracelet; those allegations lacked documentary proof or specific incidents.
  • The judgment underscores the high evidentiary threshold at the discharge stage, requiring medical findings alongside corroborative evidence beyond emotive testimony.