Overview
- Justice Ravinder Dudeja dismissed the application on September 9, ruling that a convicted prisoner may seek only parole or furlough under law.
- The refusal came a day after the Supreme Court declined to entertain another extension and directed Yadav to approach the High Court.
- The High Court said it could not extend relief originally granted by the Supreme Court under Article 142, and ordered no further interim bail.
- Yadav has been on interim bail since April 24 for his mother’s treatment and sought more time citing marriage-related reasons and the need to arrange ₹54 lakh in fines.
- Yadav is serving a 25-year no-remission term upheld in 2016, while co-convict Sukhdev Pehalwan was released this year after completing a fixed 20-year sentence.