Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Delhi High Court Questions Patanjali’s Appeal Over Chyawanprash Ads, Warns of Possible Costs

The bench cast doubt on the appeal’s necessity with a warning of potential cost sanctions.

Overview

  • Justices C Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla described the Patanjali commercials as generic disparagement and an obvious reference to Dabur.
  • Patanjali sought time to consult after the court’s remarks, and the division bench listed the appeal for further hearing on September 23.
  • The July 3 single-judge order remains in force, restraining specified TV and print claims and requiring deletion of lines including “Why settle for ordinary chyawanprash made with 40 herbs?”.
  • The bench stressed the interim order is discretionary, questioned any claim of irreparable loss, and cautioned it may impose costs for a “luxury” or “useless” appeal.
  • The single judge had noted the TV commercial’s narration by Baba Ramdev increased its persuasive impact, and Dabur’s petition alleged the ads mislabeled rivals as “ordinary” and lacking Ayurvedic knowledge.