Overview

• Counsel for Samaira and Kiaan told the court the purported will misspells names, lists a wrong address for Samaira, and even refers to Sunjay Kapur using feminine pronouns such as “she” and “her.”
• Plaintiffs cited digital irregularities, saying the file originated on Nitin Sharma’s device on February 10, showed edits on March 17 and March 24 despite a March 21 execution date, and was circulated via uncertified WhatsApp exchanges.
• They argued the executor was not informed in advance, the original has not been inspected, and the will was hurriedly handed over after the cremation, raising chain‑of‑custody concerns.
• The children contend the instrument concentrates control of an estate reported around ₹30,000 crore with Priya Kapur and her son, leaving them a smaller share, while Priya’s side denies forgery and maintains due execution.
• The court has permitted Priya to submit a verified asset list in a sealed cover, with requests for status‑quo relief on asset movements and further evidentiary testing still pending.