Overview
- Justice Ravinder Dudeja made a December 2 interim direction to preserve the police case diary permanent and declined a request to reconstruct it.
- The court said the case diary is not itself evidence but its loss could affect a fair trial, warranting preservation.
- Petitioner Devangana Kalita, joined by activist Natasha Narwal, alleged police tampered with and ante‑dated witness statements in the diary, which remains an untested claim.
- A trial court order on November 6, 2024, had refused to entertain reconstruction, citing an inability to assess the allegations’ veracity at that stage.
- The case relates to a February 2020 Jafrabad FIR from the Delhi riots, which saw one death locally, and prosecutors told the High Court proceedings were at the stage of arguments on charge.