Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Delhi Court Denies Army Major’s Plea for Hotel Data, Citing Privacy and Gender Equality

The court rejected the request for CCTV footage and booking records, emphasizing privacy rights, confidentiality obligations, and the rejection of patriarchal legal views.

The court said the idea that a man could steal another man’s wife is “dated” and takes away the woman’s choice.
Image
Image
Court denies Army Major’s request for hotel CCTV footage to prove wife’s affair

Overview

  • Civil Judge Vaibhav Pratap Singh ruled against an Army Major’s petition seeking hotel CCTV footage and records to substantiate claims of his wife’s extramarital affair.
  • The court upheld the fundamental right to privacy, extending it to hotel common areas and guest booking details, and emphasized hotels’ duty of confidentiality.
  • The ruling criticized outdated patriarchal notions, rejecting the idea of a man ‘stealing’ another’s wife and affirming women’s agency and equality.
  • The judge noted that the wife and her alleged paramour were not parties to the suit, raising concerns about their right to defend their privacy before any disclosure.
  • The judgment aligns with India’s evolving legal stance on privacy and gender equality, referencing the Supreme Court’s decriminalization of adultery and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita’s omission of adultery as a crime.