Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Defence Attacks Complainant’s Credibility as Closing Arguments Conclude in World Junior Trial

Defence counsel have depicted the complainant’s account as a 'white lie' born of regret over consensual encounters, setting the stage for the Crown’s final submissions, with a July 24 judgment scheduled.

Overview

  • Defence lawyers argued the complainant fabricated the assault narrative after sobering up and regretting consensual sex with Michael McLeod in his London hotel room.
  • Counsel challenged claims of extreme intoxication and coercion by citing surveillance footage from a bar and highlighting inconsistencies in witness testimony.
  • Alex Formenton’s defence asserted that the complainant exaggerated allegations to strengthen a civil lawsuit seeking financial compensation from Hockey Canada.
  • Crown prosecutors are set to present their closing arguments later this week, after which Justice Maria Carroccia will reserve her verdict until July 24, 2025.
  • The trial has renewed scrutiny of Hockey Canada’s 2022 settlement and is prompting broader conversations about consent protocols in sports organizations.