Overview
- Defence lawyers argued the complainant fabricated the assault narrative after sobering up and regretting consensual sex with Michael McLeod in his London hotel room.
- Counsel challenged claims of extreme intoxication and coercion by citing surveillance footage from a bar and highlighting inconsistencies in witness testimony.
- Alex Formenton’s defence asserted that the complainant exaggerated allegations to strengthen a civil lawsuit seeking financial compensation from Hockey Canada.
- Crown prosecutors are set to present their closing arguments later this week, after which Justice Maria Carroccia will reserve her verdict until July 24, 2025.
- The trial has renewed scrutiny of Hockey Canada’s 2022 settlement and is prompting broader conversations about consent protocols in sports organizations.