Daylight Saving Debate Rekindles Calls for Permanent Time Change
Experts and lawmakers clash over whether to adopt permanent daylight saving time or standard time, with health and productivity implications at the center of the discussion.
- The U.S. is set to 'spring forward' to daylight saving time on March 8, reigniting debate over whether to end biannual clock changes.
- The Sunshine Protection Act, recently reintroduced in Congress, proposes locking clocks on permanent daylight saving time, while sleep and health experts advocate for permanent standard time.
- Health professionals argue that permanent standard time aligns better with human circadian rhythms, improving sleep, productivity, and overall well-being.
- Some states, like Hawaii and most of Arizona, already observe permanent standard time, citing benefits such as earlier relief from heat and consistent sunlight patterns.
- Critics suggest that instead of focusing solely on time changes, flexible work and school schedules could better accommodate individual biological clocks and improve efficiency.