Overview

• The Supreme Constitutional Court ruled that Michaelides exhibited 'behavior unbecoming' of his role and violated his professional boundaries.
• The decision stems from a prolonged conflict between Michaelides and Attorney General George Savvides, along with Deputy Attorney General Savvas Angelides.
• Michaelides was accused of improperly intervening in legal cases, making unfounded accusations of cover-ups, and undermining the rule of law.
• The court also criticized his social media posts and public statements, which allegedly spread misinformation targeting the attorney general and his deputy.
• Michaelides, a controversial figure known for exposing government corruption, claims the ruling is unjust and a blow to free speech, suggesting it was a concerted effort to remove him.