Particle.news
Download on the App Store

CRS Flags Big Unknowns as Trump’s Golden Fleet Battleship Plan Faces Congressional Skepticism

A CRS primer plus congressional criticism highlight the proposal as conceptual, unfunded, years from procurement.

Overview

  • A Congressional Research Service report released January 2 outlines unresolved questions on cost, mission analysis, acquisition steps and technology maturity for the Navy’s proposed BBG(X) guided‑missile battleship.
  • CRS and reporting estimate a single Trump‑class ship could cost comparable to a Gerald R. Ford‑class carrier, with key elements such as railguns and high‑power lasers still unproven for near‑term integration.
  • The report notes only three U.S. shipyards could build such large surface combatants and warns that existing backlogs heighten schedule risk and tradeoffs with other Navy programs.
  • Rep. Joe Courtney, the House Seapower panel’s ranking member, questioned the need for battleships, emphasized submarine priorities and pointed out the recently signed defense budget contains no funding for the new class.
  • The Navy has signaled plans to issue early design contracts with six‑year performance windows, placing any construction in the early 2030s and potential fleet entry in the late 2030s or later.