Overview
- The Punjab and Haryana High Court invalidated Haryana's 2019 policy granting up to 10 bonus marks for socio-economic criteria in Group B and C job recruitment.
- The court ruled the policy violated Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Constitution by creating an artificial class of applicants and breaching the 50% reservation ceiling set by the Indira Sawhney case.
- The state government has been directed to publish revised recruitment results based solely on merit within three months, affecting thousands of appointments made under the policy.
- Candidates currently employed under the quashed policy will be allowed to continue in ad hoc roles or be considered for future vacancies to mitigate unfair displacement.
- The 2019 policy was criticized for lacking constitutional rule-making under Article 309 and for being unsupported by data, while the state defended it as a measure for societal welfare.