Overview
- Judge Carlos Mendoza ruled that HB 1069’s ban on material that “describes sexual conduct” is unconstitutionally vague and fails to weigh a work’s literary or educational value.
- The decision requires application of the Supreme Court’s Miller Test, assessing challenged books in their entirety rather than by isolated passages.
- The court rejected Florida’s argument that school library selections constitute government speech, finding that automatic removals based on objections do not express an official state message.
- Plaintiffs—including major publishers, The Authors Guild, five authors and two parents—prevailed on five of seven legal counts but did not secure a total invalidation of the statute.
- State officials have indicated they will appeal, leaving the fate of hundreds of removed titles and the broader enforcement of HB 1069 subject to further judicial review.