Overview

• Judge Katherine A. Crytzer denied the preliminary injunction, finding that Zeigler failed to show a probable antitrust violation under the Sherman Act.
• Zeigler’s lawsuit argued that the NCAA’s rule limiting athletes to four seasons in five years unlawfully restrains trade and deprived him of up to $4 million in potential NIL compensation.
• The NCAA maintained it does not control NIL deals or roster decisions and cautioned that granting Zeigler’s bid could displace current players and incoming recruits.
• Tennessee’s athletics department filed an affidavit guaranteeing Zeigler a roster spot for 2025-26, underscoring institutional support despite NCAA regulations.
• Zeigler’s attorneys have vowed to continue litigating the case and are weighing appeals and further evidence to challenge the eligibility rule.