Court of Appeal Rules Against Climate Protesters in Landmark Decision

The ruling removes a key legal defense for protesters accused of criminal damage, marking a significant shift in the rights to protest in England and Wales.

The Court of Appeal has ruled that protesters cannot use the defense of 'lawful excuse' based on political or philosophical beliefs to justify criminal damage.
This decision follows a series of acquittals where protesters argued they believed property owners would consent to damage if aware of climate change impacts.
The ruling has been criticized by environmental groups and human rights organizations as a major setback for climate activism.
Attorney General Victoria Prentis hailed the decision as providing clarity and consistency in the law regarding protests and criminal damage.
The ruling is expected to significantly impact future protests and legal defenses used by climate activists.