Overview
- The Home Office and Somani Hotels asked the Court of Appeal to overturn an interim injunction that would bar use of the Bell Hotel for asylum accommodation after 12 September.
- Government lawyers also challenged the High Court’s refusal to let the home secretary intervene, saying the case affects statutory duties to house asylum seekers.
- In written submissions, the Home Office warned the ruling could spur copycat council actions and disorder around other sites, citing national obligations including Article 3 ECHR.
- Somani Hotels said 138 residents would face hardship if moved and argued the highly publicised case risks setting a precedent as other councils weigh similar injunctions.
- Epping Forest District Council opposed the appeal, framing the dispute as a planning-control matter with no legal error by the judge and alleging the hotel bypassed proper permission.