Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Court Hears Final Arguments in Koran Burning Trial Over Free Speech and Public Order

Judges prepare to decide whether prosecuting Hamit Coskun for burning a Koran upholds public order without reintroducing defunct blasphemy laws.

Image
Image
Coskun, who is half Kurdish and half Armenian, denies a religiously aggravated public order offence
Image

Overview

  • Hamit Coskun is charged with a religiously aggravated public order offence after burning a Koran and shouting anti-Islam slogans outside the Turkish consulate on February 13.
  • Prosecutors told Westminster Magistrates’ Court that his actions crossed the line from political protest to behaviour posing a clear threat to public order.
  • Defence counsel Katy Thorne KC argued that the prosecution effectively revives a blasphemy offence abolished in 2008 and amounts to an abuse of process.
  • The Free Speech Union and National Secular Society are covering Coskun’s legal fees to defend the right to critique religion without criminal liability.
  • Both sides have rested their cases and a further hearing is set for Thursday afternoon, with a verdict to follow thereafter.