Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Court Hears Defense Claims Flawed DNA Software in Gilgo Beach Case

A ruling on the reliability of DNA analysis could bar key evidence in Heuermann’s case, reshaping whether charges proceed together.

Image
Alleged Gilgo serial killer Rex Heuermann appears for a frye hearing at Suffolk County Court in Riverhead, N.Y., Thursday, April 3, 2025.
Image
Image

Overview

  • Systems engineer Nathaniel Adams testified that Astrea Forensics’ IBDGem software failed 21 nationally accepted verification standards and underwent multiple updates after testing hairs in this case.
  • District Attorney Ray Tierney challenged Adams’s expertise by questioning his educational credentials and noting his history of defense-only testimony.
  • Prosecutors maintain that probabilistic genotyping is widely accepted and say rootless hairs from six victims link Rex Heuermann to killings between 1993 and 2010.
  • Heuermann’s defense has asked the court to split the seven murder counts into five separate trials to mitigate potential jury prejudice.
  • Judge Timothy Mazzei is expected to rule soon on the admissibility of the contested DNA evidence and on whether the charges will be tried together or separately.