Court Hears Challenge to Anonymity of Judges in Sara Sharif Custody Case

Media organizations argue that banning the naming of judges undermines transparency and public trust in the justice system.

The Court of Appeal is reviewing a decision to grant anonymity to judges involved in custody rulings related to Sara Sharif, who was murdered by her father and stepmother in 2023.
Mr. Justice Williams previously ruled that naming the judges could expose them to harm, citing concerns over a 'virtual lynch mob' and media misrepresentation.
Media outlets argue the ban on naming judges is unprecedented, poorly justified, and detrimental to open justice and public accountability.
Documents reveal that Sara's father had a history of abuse allegations and arrests, yet was granted custody in 2019, four years before her death.
A decision from the Court of Appeal, which has emphasized the public importance of the case, is expected in writing at a later date.