Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Conflicting mushroom sourcing and ‘who died?’ reaction highlighted in Erin Patterson trial

This week’s evidence exposed Patterson’s shifting accounts of her mushroom sourcing, followed by her apparent surprise at news of her relatives’ deaths.

Image
Image
Victoria Police digital forensics officer Shamen Fox-Henry leaves after giving evidence to Erin Patterson’s trial, where she has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder over a poisoned beef Wellington lunch in July 2023 at the Latrobe Valley Magistrates' Court in Morwell, Victoria, on Wednesday, May 21, 2025. Victoria Police examined devices seized from Erin Patterson’s home (AAP Image/Emily Woods) NO ARCHIVING, IMAGE TAKEN BY JOURNALIST
Barrister Colin Mandy SC arrives to the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court in Morwell, Victoria, Thursday, May 1, 2025. Erin Patterson is accused of murdering her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. (AAP Image/James Ross) NO ARCHIVING

Overview

  • Senior health investigator Sally Ann Atkinson told the court Patterson repeatedly changed details about when and where she acquired the dried mushrooms and whether she had used them in an earlier dish.
  • Monash Council officers searched 14 Asian grocers in Oakleigh, Clayton and Mount Waverley without finding mushrooms matching Patterson’s small, unlabelled packet.
  • Detective Sergeant Luke Farrell described Patterson’s “who died?” response when officers informed her two lunch guests had passed away and presented spattered cookbook pages during the August 2023 home search.
  • Forensic expert Shamen Fox-Henry was challenged on his training and procedures in using Magnet Axiom and a write blocker to extract data from Patterson’s computer and mobile devices.
  • The defense argues Patterson panicked under intense scrutiny over the illness outbreak, while the prosecution points to inconsistencies in her narratives as evidence of deliberate intent.