Columbia Law Review Editors Strike Over Censorship Dispute

Controversy erupts after board of directors shuts down website to block publication of contentious article

Student editors demand removal of disclaimer and full editorial independence.
The board's intervention followed claims of procedural irregularities in the article's publication.
The article, critical of Israel, bypassed usual peer review and editorial processes.
The board's actions have sparked broader discussions on editorial freedom and oversight.
The strike's long-term impact on Columbia Law Review and other journals remains uncertain.