Closing Arguments Conclude in Michael Madigan Corruption Trial

Defense attorneys challenge credibility of key witnesses and deny allegations of bribery and racketeering against the former Illinois House Speaker.

Michael Madigan's attorney, Dan Collins, argued that the indictment's 23 charges lack credible evidence, calling it 'a worthless piece of paper.'
The defense heavily criticized cooperating witness Daniel Solis, portraying him as unreliable and accusing him of providing false testimony.
Prosecutors allege Madigan and co-defendant Michael McClain engaged in bribery schemes involving ComEd and AT&T to pass favorable legislation.
Madigan's legal team denied any quid pro quo, asserting that actions such as recommending hires or supporting legislation were not tied to personal gain.
The jury is set to begin deliberations following the government's rebuttal and final instructions from Judge John Robert Blakey.