Cities Split Over Trump’s Homelessness Enforcement Order
Federal incentives are driving aggressive camp clearances that mandate involuntary treatment, prompting legal challenges from advocates warning of civil-rights infringements.
Overview
- The executive order directs federal agencies to support jurisdictions that ban camping, squatting, public drug use and loitering while incentivizing involuntary mental health and addiction treatment.
- San Jose and other cities have increased encampment clearances, arrested individuals refusing shelter and used civil-commitment policies to transfer people into treatment facilities.
- Supporters such as Rep. Abe Hamadeh and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan describe the order as a compassionate public safety measure that expands treatment options and protects neighborhood order.
- The National Alliance to End Homelessness and housing advocates argue that punitive sweeps displace unhoused people without reducing homelessness, undermine housing-first programs and threaten overdose-prevention sites.
- Implementation is uneven nationwide, with legal challenges to forced treatment mandates and pushback against shifting funding from affordable housing to enforcement.