Particle.news
Download on the App Store

CIC Bars Practising Advocates from Using RTI for Client Cases

The commission cited a Madras High Court ruling to stress that the transparency law serves public-interest aims rather than private legal work.

Overview

  • Information Commissioner Sudha Rani Relangi dismissed a second appeal tied to a terminated fruits-and-vegetables supply contract at a Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya in Haryana.
  • The appellant, an advocate, had sought records for his brother, and the CIC said representative use is impermissible without showing why the principal could not apply.
  • Relying on Madras High Court precedent, the order affirms that a practising lawyer may request information as a citizen but not for cases handled for clients.
  • The CPIO’s response was upheld after the authority reported records lost in a July 2024 office fire and denied personal data under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
  • The Commission disposed of the appeal and directed that copies of written submissions be provided to the appellant.