Overview
- The tribunal confirmed that the pellets which caused Gatica’s total, permanent blindness came from Claudio Crespo’s shotgun but ruled there was insufficient proof to convict him of apremios ilegítimos.
- The court reasoned that Crespo acted in lawful defense during a public-order operation, describing the threat he faced as illegitimate and potentially lethal.
- Gatica, now a deputy-elect, said identifying the shooter brings him some calm as his legal team prepares a nullity appeal to pursue accountability.
- Left-wing lawmakers denounced the acquittal and argued it reflects protections for police under the 2023 Naín Retamal law.
- President Gabriel Boric questioned the proportionality of the force used and voiced dismay at the lack of a conviction while acknowledging judicial autonomy.