Canada's Online Harms Bill Sparks Controversy Over Free Speech

Justice Minister defends the bill as necessary for combating hate speech, while critics warn of Orwellian implications and potential for censorship.

Justice Minister Arif Virani defends the Online Harms Bill, emphasizing its focus on combating hate speech without stifling freedom of expression.
Margaret Atwood and other prominent figures express concerns over the bill's potential to infringe on free speech and liken it to Orwellian thoughtcrime.
The bill proposes severe penalties for hate speech, including life imprisonment, sparking debate over its implications for free speech.
Critics argue the bill could lead to censorship and abuse of power, with some comparing it to authoritarian practices.
Supporters argue the bill is necessary to protect children and combat online harms, but its broad scope and severe penalties raise concerns.