Breyer Critiques Conservative SCOTUS Majority's Interpretation Methods

The retired justice warns that 'textualism' and 'originalism' could lead to a constitution and legal system that fails to address modern challenges.

Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer criticizes the conservative majority's approach to constitutional interpretation, warning it could lead to undesirable outcomes.
Breyer's new book, 'Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism,' challenges the prevailing 'textualism' and 'originalism' methods favored by conservative justices.
The retired justice expresses concern that these methods of interpretation will not address modern problems effectively and may turn law into chaos.
Despite his criticisms, Breyer emphasizes the importance of civility and participation among justices, regardless of ideological differences.
Breyer warns against the potential consequences of overturning too many cases, suggesting it could lead to legal uncertainty and chaos.