Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Boston Bench Trial Tests Trump-Backed Deportation Policy for Pro-Palestinian Scholars

Testimony this week will probe whether visa revocations by the administration unlawfully suppressed pro-Palestinian advocacy.

FILE - A crowd gathers in Foley Square, outside the Manhattan federal court, in support of Mahmoud Khalil, March 12, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Stefan Jeremiah, File)
Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil speaks at a rally to welcome him home after being released from immigration custody, outside the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City, U.S., June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Caitlin Ochs/File Photo
Mahmoud Khalil stands with his wife Noor Abdalla
Image

Overview

  • A two-week bench trial began July 7 in Boston before U.S. District Judge William Young to decide if the administration’s visa revocations and detentions of pro-Palestinian academics breached First Amendment and Administrative Procedure Act standards.
  • The American Association of University Professors and Middle East Studies Association allege an unwritten policy has targeted noncitizen students and faculty for pro-Palestinian speech through visa cancellations and deportation threats.
  • Department of Justice attorneys argue no ideological deportation policy exists and maintain that constitutional protections apply differently in immigration enforcement contexts.
  • Professors Megan Hyska and Nadje Al-Ali testified that the high-profile detentions of Mahmoud Khalil and Rümeysa Öztürk prompted them to self-censor, remove social media posts and avoid public protests.
  • Judge Young emphasized the trial’s fact-finding role and will determine appropriate remedies if he finds that the administration violated free-speech rights or APA procedures.