Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Bombay High Court Reserves Order on Hany Babu’s Bail Plea in Bhima Koregaon Case

The hearing was confined to claims that prolonged custody violates Article 21 due to stalled proceedings.

Overview

  • A Division Bench of Justices A. S. Gadkari and R. R. Bhonsale closed the matter for orders on Friday, saying the decision will take time.
  • Babu has been in custody since July 28, 2020, with charges yet to be framed; his counsel says a two‑year‑old discharge plea remains unanswered, while the NIA says it has filed its reply and the trial court chose to hear all discharge pleas together.
  • The court limited consideration to the length of incarceration and did not examine the merits of the UAPA allegations.
  • Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh opposed bail, alleging involvement in terror activity and arguing Babu’s custody is shorter than that of co‑accused such as Rona Wilson and Sudhir Dhawade.
  • Senior advocate Yug Mohit Chaudhary argued for bail citing over five years in jail, missed timelines to commence trial, and higher‑court grants of bail to other accused, noting a trial deadline of October 8 with the next date on October 9.