Overview
- Anomalies included theory scores of 257 out of 100 and practical marks of 225 out of 30 revealed in the third-semester results.
- University has corrected the published discrepancies and begun preparing revised mark sheets for distribution.
- The computer operator responsible for data entry received a formal warning and staff were ordered to implement stricter verification protocols.
- Despite the corrections, several postgraduate students still await final clearance and face delays in their academic progression.
- The incident follows a history of evaluation and publication errors at the public institution, raising questions about administrative reliability.