Athlete Group Opposes $2.8B NCAA Settlement
The National College Players Association argues the deal limits earning potential and undermines existing NIL systems.
- The NCPA claims the settlement would end booster-funded collectives, reducing athlete income.
- A federal judge will soon decide on preliminary approval of the $2.8 billion settlement.
- Critics argue the settlement allows conferences to halt revenue-sharing if athletes gain employee status.
- The NCPA has a history of advocating for athlete rights and opposes the deal's long-term implications.
- Supporters believe the settlement is a step forward but acknowledge it isn't perfect.
ESPN 
Associated Press 
Sportico 