Arizona Supreme Court to Hear Appeal on Controversial Border-Control Ballot Measure
Activists argue the proposed law violates constitutional rules and could lead to racial profiling and increased policing costs.
- The measure, HCR 2060, would criminalize illegal border crossings and increase penalties for fentanyl sales resulting in death.
- Activist groups claim the proposal violates the single-subject rule required for ballot measures.
- Supporters argue the measure addresses border security and should be decided by voters.
- Opponents fear the law could lead to racial profiling and significant financial burdens on local governments.
- The court's decision is expected between late July and mid-August, ahead of the November ballot printing.