Overview
- The Court of Appeal held a public permission hearing at 10:30 a.m. at the Royal Courts of Justice before Lady Justice King, Lady Justice Whipple and Lord Justice Dingemans.
- Al-Haq’s lawyers said officials failed to weigh the risk that UK-supplied parts could facilitate widespread war crimes against the different risk of disrupting the F-35 programme.
- They also argued the carve-out is justiciable because it is a London-made decision about exports from the UK and therefore falls within domestic jurisdiction.
- The government, represented by Sir James Eadie KC, urged judges to refuse permission, calling the arguments unarguable and asking for finality, with a written decision to follow.
- The challenge targets last year’s exemption for F-35 components maintained on Defence Secretary John Healey’s advice to protect the multinational programme, a carve-out the High Court upheld in June, as NGOs back the case and UN experts criticized recent US sanctions on Al-Haq.