Overview
- Hearing a plea to quash an August FIR from Sultanpur, the court examined allegations of a prayer meeting, an LED screen showing sermons, and Bible distribution said to target Dalits and poor families.
- The judges noted that no person initially claimed coercion, allurement, or conversion, with an accusation of inducement surfacing only in statements recorded nearly two months later.
- Criticizing police for arresting the accused on the day of the FIR, the bench said the record lacked the essential victim allegation required to invoke Section 3 of the 2021 Act.
- Citing the Supreme Court’s Rajendra Bihari Lal ruling, the court stressed strict compliance with the special law’s safeguards rather than acting on presumptions.
- The bench issued notice to the complainant to explain his authority and conduct, sought a state counter-affidavit on specific queries within weeks, questioned application of BNS Sections 351(3) and 352, and set the matter for a further hearing.