Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Allahabad High Court Reserves Verdict on Rahul Gandhi Plea, Puts Varanasi Order on Hold

The case tests Indian jurisdiction over foreign speeches alongside the threshold for inferring intent from political remarks.

Overview

  • Justice Sameer Jain reserved judgment on Rahul Gandhi’s challenge to the Varanasi MP/MLA court’s 21 July order directing a fresh hearing on an FIR plea.
  • The High Court kept the sessions court’s order in abeyance and directed the Varanasi magistrate not to proceed until the ruling is delivered.
  • Varanasi resident Nageshwar Mishra alleged Gandhi made provocative remarks about Sikhs during a September 2024 event in the United States and sought an FIR.
  • A magistrate dismissed the plea on 28 November 2024 citing extraterritorial jurisdiction issues, before a sessions court revived it for reconsideration.
  • Gandhi’s counsel argued mens rea cannot be inferred from isolated lines and that the full speech must be considered, while the state said his office lends weight to divisive remarks.