Overview

• Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra ruled that Puranic illustrations constitute hearsay and cannot support ownership claims over the 13.37-acre Mathura site
• The application by advocate Anil Kumar Singh Bishen, filed on behalf of Shriji Radha Rani through next friend Reena N Singh, sought her impleadment as a joint plaintiff
• The bench noted there was no evidence of a Radha Rani temple on the disputed property and no documentation of her legal rights
• Plaintiff No. 1 did not oppose Radha Rani’s inclusion but other parties warned it would complicate proceedings, prompting the court to dismiss the plea
• The main title suit remains pending with the next hearing scheduled for July 4, 2025