Overview
- On March 26, 2025, Jerome Dewald used an AI-generated avatar to deliver his opening argument in an employment dispute before the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division.
- Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels interrupted the presentation immediately, expressing disapproval and stating that Dewald had misled the court about his intentions.
- Dewald explained that his decision stemmed from difficulties with public speaking and admitted to using a generic avatar created by a San Francisco tech company after time constraints prevented a custom one.
- The incident has prompted debates over the ethical and practical boundaries of AI in legal proceedings, with legal experts emphasizing the importance of human interaction in courtroom advocacy.
- Judicial authorities have underscored that while AI tools can assist in legal processes, they cannot replace the dynamic and responsive nature of human representation in court.