Advocacy Group Withdraws Unionization Case Against NCAA as Player Compensation Rules Evolve

The National College Players Association cites new state laws and NCAA revenue-sharing plans as reasons for halting its legal push for athlete unionization.

• The National College Players Association (NCPA) has filed to withdraw its complaint against the NCAA, Pac-12, and USC, which sought to establish college athletes as employees with unionization rights.
• The decision follows recent changes in state laws and NCAA agreements that will allow schools to directly pay athletes through revenue-sharing starting this summer, with top schools expected to distribute over $20 million in the first year.
• The NCPA stated that the withdrawal aims to allow the college sports industry time to adapt to these new compensation models before revisiting the question of employment status for athletes.
• This move comes shortly after Dartmouth men's basketball players dropped their unionization effort, citing concerns about setting legal precedents under a new Republican-led National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
• The only remaining legal case regarding athlete employment status is Johnson v. NCAA, which focuses on securing minimum wage and overtime pay for college athletes under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

3 Articles

Associated Press ESPN Sportico