Particle.news
Download on the App Store
169 ARTICLES
·
last yr.

ACLU Defends Trump in January 6th Case Citing First Amendment Rights and Vague Gag Order; Six More Indicted Associates Reportedly Discuss Plea Deals; Trump Exits New York Trial for Violating Gag Order

ACLU argues broad gag order stifles Trump's First Amendment rights, citing "unconstitutionally vague" terms, as six more indicted associates reportedly negotiate plea deals. Trump faces $10,000 fine for violating gag order in New York, while former allies may pose significant legal threats with potential testimonies.

Overview

  • The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has defended former President Trump in his case over the events of January 6th, arguing that the gag order issued against him is unconstitutionally vague and infringes on his First Amendment rights.
  • The ACLU contends that the term 'target' used in the order is ambiguous and could potentially curb Trump's, and the public's, constitutional rights to free speech.
  • In a related development, plea deals have reportedly been discussed between prosecutors and at least six more Trump co-defendants, indicating that more allies could turn against the former president.
  • Trump faced a $10,000 fine after violating a gag order during a civil fraud trial in New York. The judge warned of potentially stricter penalties, including imprisonment should future violations occur.
  • Trump abruptly left the court generating surprise among the attendees. He justified his action by stating the trial was won after Michael Cohen, a witness against him, backtracked on earlier testimony.